![]()
On a hard drive the seemingly random operations aren't fast to begin with, but interrupt them with any other IO requests that may be happening in the background (saving files, backing up a disk, launching another application, etc.) and the application you're trying to launch will take significantly longer. The process of launching an application involves a lot of sequential and seemingly random reads (they aren't totally random but they aren't totally sequential either). Application launch speed is one area where an SSD really shines. The same is true for launching an application. For example, opening an image in Photoshop will take longer if the sequential read operation is constantly interrupted by several other reads spread out over the platters. These aren't huge IO operations, but since we're dealing with mechanical storage they significantly reduce the throughput of other IO requests. It seems like the more you have installed, the greater the chances are of there being small file random reads/writes going on in the background while you're trying to do other things on your computer. The issue is that once you have a few applications installed and start multitasking with a notebook that only has a 5400RPM hard drive application response time stops being consistent. To be honest the new MacBook Pros feel slow to me right out of the box. Apple 2011 macbook pro trading upgrade#I've said this countless times in the past but an SSD is the single best upgrade you can do to your computer. Apple 2011 macbook pro trading mac#This isn't Mac specific advice, but if you've got a modern Mac notebook I'd highly recommend upgrading to an SSD before you even consider the new MacBook Pro. In the past Apple has had serious compatibility issues with 3rd party SSDs, so there is some merit to the BTO SSD option. In exchange for the price premium, what you do get is a drive that Apple will support completely (and also official TRIM support, no 3rd party drives have TRIM support under OS X). The SSDs are still 3Gbps and will be a huge improvement over the standard hard drive, but just know that you aren't getting the best performance possible. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple used the same controller in the new MacBook Pros. ![]() In the MacBook Air Apple standardized on a Toshiba controller, delivering performance nearly identical to Kingston's SSDNow V+100. We're probably only one more generation away from seeing a standard SSD on some of these models. At $100 for a 128GB drive you really can't beat the upgrade price there. Pricing actually isn't bad for the upgraded 13-inch and especially the upgraded 15-inch models. Apple 2011 macbook pro trading mac os#Other than installing Mac OS X, I pretty much never use the optical drive so the optibay approach in my opinion is a good combination of the performance of an SSD with the mass storage of a mechanical disk.Īpple offers an array of BTO (Build to Order) SSD options, however the drives are likely of average performance. If you need the additional capacity there's always the optibay route, which replaces the optical drive with another 2.5" HDD bay. While 5400RPM is pretty slow, any additional money you spend on storage should go towards an SSD and not a faster mechanical drive. I personally don't mind the lack of hard drive options. All of the models have a single 2.5" 5400RPM hard drive and an integrated slot-load DVD drive. Despite the rumors, the 2011 MacBook Pro lineup does nothing to change the storage setup of the machine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |